Digital Scholarship@UNLV

Title

Evaluating the Convergent Validity of the Measure of Emotional Connotations

Authors

Daniel N. Erosa, University of Nevada, Las VegasFollow

Document Type

Poster

Publication Date

2012

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Center for Academic Enrichment and Outreach

Publisher Location

Las Vegas (Nev.)

Abstract

The Measure of Emotional Connotations (MEC; Barchard, Kirsch, Anderson, Grob, & Anderson, 2012) is a new test that has been developed to measure the ability to perceive the emotional connotations of written language. To examine its convergent validity, the MEC will be correlated with the two emotion perception tasks on the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT; Mayer, Salovey, Caruso, & Sitarenious, 2003). These MSCEIT tasks are valid tests of emotion perception; thus, strong correlations would provide support for the MEC as a valid test of emotion perception.

Keywords

Emotions; Language and emotions; Perception

Disciplines

Cognition and Perception | Cognitive Psychology | Community-Based Research | Psychology

File Format

pdf

File Size

677 KB

Language

English

Comments

Mentor: Kimberly Barchard

Rights

IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Repository Citation

Erosa, D. N. (2012). Evaluating the Convergent Validity of the Measure of Emotional Connotations.
Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/mcnair_posters/18