Title
Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-2010
Publication Title
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Publisher
Academy of Management
Volume
9
Issue
4
First page number:
715
Last page number:
725
Abstract
This research-based essay presents survey results collected from faculty in 104 PhD-granting management departments of AACSB-accredited business schools in the United States regarding 11 different types of questionable research conduct, including data fabrication, data falsification, plagiarism, inappropriately accepting or assigning authorship credit, and publishing the same data or results in two or more publications. Findings suggest that instances of research misconduct covering a broad array of behaviors are not unknown to survey respondents.
Disciplines
Business | Education | Higher Education | Management Information Systems | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Language
English
Permissions
Use Find in Your Library, contact the author, or interlibrary loan to garner a copy of the item. Publisher policy does not allow archiving the final published version. If a post-print (author's peer-reviewed manuscript) is allowed and available, or publisher policy changes, the item will be deposited.
Repository Citation
Bedeian, A. G.,
Taylor, S. G.,
Miller, A. N.
(2010).
Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors.
Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4),
715-725.