Document Type
Report
Publication Date
12-2012
Publisher
Brookings Mountain West
First page number:
1
Last page number:
27
Abstract
Utah has become an unlikely leader in regional planning through a voluntary partnership of key leaders, agencies, local government, and the general public. Given that regional planning efforts around the nation have generally evoked strong reactions from residents concerned about losing local control, the success of Envision Utah—the organization that emerged as a key driver of regional planning in Utah—in building a consensus around regional growth management holds lessons for other regions.
Envision Utah adopted several strategies that have distinguished Utah’s regional planning efforts from other regions and given rise to what can be called the “Utah model” of collaborative planning. Envision Utah found success by not only tapping into people’s shared values and aspirations, but also because of its significant public engagement, use of convincing, unbiased data to demonstrate the need to work regionally, and ability to garner broad buy‐in from important stakeholders in the community.
As more is learned from Envision Utah’s success in regional coordination, a number of takeaways appear relevant for other regions:
- Pay attention to the sustainability and capacity of the leading organization
- Arm the public with clear data and analysis, skillfully marketed
- Package all proposals and principles to appeal to the values of the community
- Spend time initiating and maintaining the right political setup
Keywords
Leadership; Politics; Practical; Regional planning; Sustainability; Utah; Values
Disciplines
Growth and Development | Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation | Policy History, Theory, and Methods | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration | Urban Studies and Planning
Language
English
Repository Citation
Scheer, B. C.
(2012).
The Utah Model: Lessons for Regional Planning.
1-27.
Available at:
https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/brookings_pubs/21
Included in
Growth and Development Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons