The “Angelina Effect” and Audience Response to Celebrity vs. Medical Expert Health Messages: an Examination of Source Credibility, Message Elaboration, and Behavioral Intentions
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-28-2019
Publication Title
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
First page number:
1
Last page number:
13
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation is to examine responses to celebrity vs. medical experts’ health messages. Data were collected online from 357 participants at a large southwestern university. Results indicate that participants found the celebrity to be more credible than the medical expert in offering the health message. Women elaborated on the female celebrity’s health message to a significantly greater degree than men elaborated on the male celebrity health message. Regarding behavioral intentions (e.g., raise awareness, learn more, get screened, and encourage screening) due to the health message, men reported greater behavioral intentions due to the male celebrity message than the male medical expert message. Finally, women reported greater behavioral intentions due to the female medical expert’s message than men reported due to a male medical expert’s message. Discussion and future directions follow.
Keywords
Celebrity; Health messages; Elaboration likelihood model; Gender; Social influence; Credibility
Disciplines
Urban Studies and Planning
Language
English
Repository Citation
Emmers-Sommer, T. M.,
Teran, L.
(2019).
The “Angelina Effect” and Audience Response to Celebrity vs. Medical Expert Health Messages: an Examination of Source Credibility, Message Elaboration, and Behavioral Intentions.
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
1-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-0375-z