Presentation Title

Borges and Foucault, between Babylon and Babel

Presenter Information

Brennan ZerbeFollow

Presentation Type

Paper

Abstract

In spite of some isolated if valuable efforts on the part of a few scholars, Jorge Luis Borges’ short stories and Michel Foucault’s essays are still considered as belonging to different realms of writing, namely fiction and historical philosophy, each corresponding to different and specific intents, both aesthetically and referentially. However, the links subtending the thought of Foucault and that of Borges clearly point to shared sites of emphasis which deserve further attention, such as recursion, the tenuousness of identity and most of all, epistemological uncertainty, as if one established a fictional narrative to demonstrate or interrogate epistemological truths while the other composed an epistemological narrative to challenge what he considers to be fictitious. My goal is to further explore the ramifications of this semiotic correspondence and to evaluate its significance outside of the traditional academic literary frame by transcending the opposition between high/classical and low/popular culture.

Keywords

Borges, Foucault, Epistemological Narratives, Identity, Fiction, Historical Narratives, Recursion

Comments

Dear friends,

I hope to see you in March in Las Vegas.

Best Wishes,

Brennan


Share

COinS
 

Borges and Foucault, between Babylon and Babel

In spite of some isolated if valuable efforts on the part of a few scholars, Jorge Luis Borges’ short stories and Michel Foucault’s essays are still considered as belonging to different realms of writing, namely fiction and historical philosophy, each corresponding to different and specific intents, both aesthetically and referentially. However, the links subtending the thought of Foucault and that of Borges clearly point to shared sites of emphasis which deserve further attention, such as recursion, the tenuousness of identity and most of all, epistemological uncertainty, as if one established a fictional narrative to demonstrate or interrogate epistemological truths while the other composed an epistemological narrative to challenge what he considers to be fictitious. My goal is to further explore the ramifications of this semiotic correspondence and to evaluate its significance outside of the traditional academic literary frame by transcending the opposition between high/classical and low/popular culture.