Casino Diplomacy in Minnesota: Lessons from America’s First Tribal Casino Compacts
Session Title
Session 1-4-D: Policy and Regulation, Part 3
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation
Location
Park MGM, Las Vegas, NV
Start Date
23-5-2023 3:45 PM
End Date
23-5-2023 5:15 PM
Disciplines
American Politics | Indigenous Studies | Native American Studies | Oral History | Social and Cultural Anthropology
Abstract
In 1987, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that tribal governments can legalize and regulate gambling as they see fit. The following year, Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), which imposed that tribal governments seeking to pursue Class 3 (or “Las Vegas style”) gambling, must first enter into a legally binding agreement, known as a compact, with the surrounding state government. Some states refused to negotiate. Others demanded sunset clauses, revenue sharing, and size limitations. In 1989, Minnesota and the 11 tribal governments that it surrounds signed the first tribal casino compacts in the United States, which impose none of the restrictions that have become common in other states’ compacts. What about Minnesota’s tribal-state relations led the state to become the first to sign compacts? What do the unique history and features of Minnesota tribal casino compacts teach us about tribal-state diplomacy? This presentation draws on archival and oral history research to provide two key lessons from America’s first tribal casino compacts: 1) states should be wary of underestimating tribal governments, and 2) arbitrary limitations on casino compacts can jeopardize both tribal and state development.
Implication Statement: Oral history and archival research on America’s first tribal casino compacts reveal invaluable lessons for policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders.
Keywords
Tribal Casinos, Tribal Government, Economic Development
Casino Diplomacy in Minnesota: Lessons from America’s First Tribal Casino Compacts
Park MGM, Las Vegas, NV
In 1987, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that tribal governments can legalize and regulate gambling as they see fit. The following year, Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), which imposed that tribal governments seeking to pursue Class 3 (or “Las Vegas style”) gambling, must first enter into a legally binding agreement, known as a compact, with the surrounding state government. Some states refused to negotiate. Others demanded sunset clauses, revenue sharing, and size limitations. In 1989, Minnesota and the 11 tribal governments that it surrounds signed the first tribal casino compacts in the United States, which impose none of the restrictions that have become common in other states’ compacts. What about Minnesota’s tribal-state relations led the state to become the first to sign compacts? What do the unique history and features of Minnesota tribal casino compacts teach us about tribal-state diplomacy? This presentation draws on archival and oral history research to provide two key lessons from America’s first tribal casino compacts: 1) states should be wary of underestimating tribal governments, and 2) arbitrary limitations on casino compacts can jeopardize both tribal and state development.
Implication Statement: Oral history and archival research on America’s first tribal casino compacts reveal invaluable lessons for policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders.