Session Title
Poster Session
Presentation Type
Poster Presentation
Location
Park MGM, Las Vegas, NV
Start Date
24-5-2023 10:30 AM
End Date
24-5-2023 11:15 AM
Disciplines
Clinical Psychology
Abstract
Presentation Abstract:
Since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Murphy vs. NCAA, a majority of states have legalized and launched sports gambling. With the increased prevalence of sports wagering, there are many concerns about possible increases in problem gambling and the effects of specific wagering behaviors (e.g., in-game bets vs. pre-game bets; money-line wagers vs. parlay cards) on problem gambling outcomes. More generally, while the literature surrounding sports gambling is increasing, little is known about specific wagering practices. Similarly, little is known about how responsible gaming practices (i.e., as measured by the Positive Play Scale) might be related to specific sports wagering habits. The present research aims to address this gap in research by exploring the differences in responsible play between the most popular forms of sports wagering. We assess these factors in a sample of adults in the United States who have recently bet on sports (N = 1,553) and a more general, representative sample of the U.S. population (N = 2,806). Results generally indicate that specific sports wagering behaviors are indeed related to positive play behaviors, which suggests that responsible gaming practices do influence the types of wagering people engage in.
Implications Statement:
Understanding the differences between responsible gambling behaviors of various forms of sports gambling could help understand what behaviors to look for in potential problem gamblers. If it can be determined which types of sports gambling are more associated with irresponsible gambling behavior, new targets for education and prevention efforts can be generated.
Keywords
Positive Play, Sports Gambling, Wagering Behaviors
Funding Sources
Funding Sources During the past 3 years, Joshua B. Grubbs has received funding from the International Center for Responsible Gaming, the Problem Gambling Network of Ohio, and the Kindbridge Research Institute. During the past 3 years, Shane W. Kraus has received funding from the International Center for Responsible Gaming, MGM Resorts International, Center for the Application of Substance Abuse Technologies, Taylor Francis, Springer Nature, The Nevada Problem Gambling Project, Sports Betting Alliance, and Kindbridge Research Institute.
Competing Interests
Competing Interests During the past 3 years, Joshua B. Grubbs has received funding from the International Center for Responsible Gaming, Springer Science + Business Media, the Kentucky Psychological Association, the Center for Anxiety, the Center on Alcohol, Substance Use and Addictions, the Problem Gambling Network of Ohio, the Kindbridge Research Institute, the Charles Koch Foundation, the Conru Foundation, and the National Institute for Civil Discourse. During the past 3 years, Shane W. Kraus has received funding from the International Center for Responsible Gaming, MGM Resorts International, Center for the Application of Substance Abuse Technologies, Taylor Francis, Springer Nature, The Nevada Problem Gambling Project, Sports Betting Alliance, and Kindbridge Research Institute.
Included in
Differences in Positive Play Among Specific Sports Wagering Behaviors
Park MGM, Las Vegas, NV
Presentation Abstract:
Since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Murphy vs. NCAA, a majority of states have legalized and launched sports gambling. With the increased prevalence of sports wagering, there are many concerns about possible increases in problem gambling and the effects of specific wagering behaviors (e.g., in-game bets vs. pre-game bets; money-line wagers vs. parlay cards) on problem gambling outcomes. More generally, while the literature surrounding sports gambling is increasing, little is known about specific wagering practices. Similarly, little is known about how responsible gaming practices (i.e., as measured by the Positive Play Scale) might be related to specific sports wagering habits. The present research aims to address this gap in research by exploring the differences in responsible play between the most popular forms of sports wagering. We assess these factors in a sample of adults in the United States who have recently bet on sports (N = 1,553) and a more general, representative sample of the U.S. population (N = 2,806). Results generally indicate that specific sports wagering behaviors are indeed related to positive play behaviors, which suggests that responsible gaming practices do influence the types of wagering people engage in.
Implications Statement:
Understanding the differences between responsible gambling behaviors of various forms of sports gambling could help understand what behaviors to look for in potential problem gamblers. If it can be determined which types of sports gambling are more associated with irresponsible gambling behavior, new targets for education and prevention efforts can be generated.