Boiling Frogs: Reconsidering the Impact of Deviance Targets, Severity, and Frequency in Teams
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2022
Publication Title
Journal of Business Research
Volume
142
First page number:
1026
Last page number:
1037
Abstract
Deviance can impact team performance but it is unclear how this process unfolds. Common measures delineate between interpersonal and organizational deviance rather than considering the impact felt by teammates. Instead, we categorize deviant acts into team-relevant and team-irrelevant measures. We then consider how deviance severity and frequency impact affective states and team performance. Guided by affective events theory's focus on work events shaping emotional reactions and subsequent behaviors, we suggest that deviant acts that are negative work events increase negative affect and harm team performance, particularly when frequent. Team-irrelevant deviance is not a negative work event and thus should not impact team affect or performance. Within team-relevant deviance, because severe forms are objectively wrong and punished severely, teammates can overcome them whereas subtle and clandestine minor forms harm the team the most, especially when frequent. Support was found within 1114 recorded deviant acts from 435 employees in 114 organizational teams.
Keywords
Affective events theory; Deviance severity; Deviance target; Negative affect; Team performance; Workplace deviance
Disciplines
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research | Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance
Repository Citation
Baur, J. E.,
Bradley, B. H.,
Bonner, R. L.
(2022).
Boiling Frogs: Reconsidering the Impact of Deviance Targets, Severity, and Frequency in Teams.
Journal of Business Research, 142
1026-1037.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.035