"Beyond the Chart: Reflections on Transforming Data into Patient-Center" by Jun Hee Bae, Lucas Batin et al.
 

Authors

Jun Hee Bae, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Lucas Batin, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Melinda Borsuk-Pollard, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Joel Christian, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Jennifer Cook, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Audrie Lainier Cruz Lainier Cruz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Edher De La Cruz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Karla Del-moral, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Natalie Edran, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Nico Leonard Flores, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Elizabeth Gallagher, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Matthew Gamboa, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Caroline Garcia, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Amanda Gornet, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Justin Grewal, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Christopher Hansen, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Tushar Jadhav, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Derek Johnson, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Denise Martinez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Jasmine Martinez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Elisha Morgan-Lange, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Michael Neff, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Sin Ng, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Elaine Nguyen, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Talia Ochoa, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Kylee Peters, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Dustin Poe, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Aaron Quiamzon, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Alyssa Reyes, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Valentina Staleva, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Ashley Stringfield, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Cameron Tennies, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Carol Torio, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Caden Trevino, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Zachary Tuvida, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Tiffany Vu, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Nicole Wilson, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Editors

Jennifer Vanderlaan, PhD

Document Type

Abstract

Publication Date

3-5-2024

First page number:

1

Last page number:

42

Abstract

The Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom (DIKW) Framework is a foundational model in nursing informatics that helps conceptualize how raw data is transformed into meaningful clinical decision-making. At its core, the framework describes four hierarchical levels: data (raw, unprocessed facts), information (organized and contextualized data), knowledge (synthesized information based on experience and evidence), and wisdom (the ability to apply knowledge in practice to achieve the best patient outcomes). In nursing, this framework is particularly valuable because it mirrors the cognitive processes nurses use to assess, interpret, and act on patient information in real-time clinical settings.

Developing critical thinking is a challenge for student nurses as they must learn to move beyond task-based thinking to recognizing patterns, making connections, and anticipating patient needs. Nurses work most closely with patients, continuously gathering and interpreting data from direct interactions. Nurses are at the bedside observing trends over time, integrating subjective cues, and responding dynamically to evolving patient needs. Novice nurses often struggle with information overload, unsure of which data points are most relevant or how to prioritize competing demands in a fast-paced clinical environment. By using the DIKW framework, students gain a structured way to organize and process clinical information, helping them make sense of complex patient cases. This approach bridges the gap between classroom knowledge and real-world application, guiding students toward independent, confident clinical reasoning that leads to better patient care and outcomes.

Using the DIKW framework to explain clinical decisions enhances student nurse clinical reasoning skills by helping them recognize how seemingly isolated data points contribute to a larger clinical picture. For example, a student may document a blood pressure reading of 88/50 mmHg (data). When combined with the patient’s dizziness and recent medication changes, the data become information that suggests hypotension. Drawing on knowledge of pharmacology and fluid balance, the student understands that the patient's antihypertensive medication may need adjustment. Finally, wisdom is demonstrated when the student collaborates with the healthcare team to adjust the care plan, ensuring patient safety. By following this structured thinking process, students develop the ability to critically evaluate patient information rather than relying on memorization or intuition alone.

We hope these reflections on clinical judgement, written by experienced nurses in the masters of nursing program at UNLV, helps student nurses learn to integrate research findings, clinical guidelines, and team-based communication into their decision-making. This approach not only strengthens their ability to navigate complex patient cases but also builds confidence in their clinical judgment. By guiding students through this structured framework, nurse educators equip them with the tools to think like a nurse, ensuring they become competent, reflective, and effective practitioners.

Controlled Subject

Nursing informatics; Nursing--Study and teaching; Clinical medicine--Decision making

Disciplines

Nursing

File Format

PDF

File Size

714 KB

Language

English

Rights

IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/


Included in

Nursing Commons

Share

COinS