Methodological quality and scientific impact of quantitative nursing education research over 18 months
Nursing Education Perspectives
First page number:
Last page number:
The methodological quality of nursing education research has not been rigorously studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality and scientific impact of nursing education research reports. The methodological quality of 133 quantitative nursing education research articles published between July 2006 and December 2007 was evaluated using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).The mean (+/- SD) MERSQI score was 9.8 +/- 2.2. It correlated (p < .05) with several scientific impact indicators: citation counts from Scopus (r = .223), Google Scholar (r = .224), and journal impact factor (r = .216); it was not associated with Web of Science citation count, funding, or h Index. The similarities between this study's MERSQI ratings for nursing literature and those reported for the medical literature, coupled with the association with citation counts, suggest that the MERSQI is an appropriate instrument to evaluate the quality of nursing education research.
Bibliometrics; Humans; Nursing – Study and teaching – Research – Methodology; Nursing Education Research/economics; Nursing Education Research/methods; Research – Methodology; Research Design; Research Support as Topic
Yucha, C. B.,
Schneider, B. S.,
Methodological quality and scientific impact of quantitative nursing education research over 18 months.
Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(6),