Authenticity vs. Accuracy vs. Legitimacy: Pagano on the Vatican Documents
Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo
First page number:
Last page number:
This essay is a critical appreciation of the scholarly work on Galileo’s trial by Mons. Sergio Pagano (Prefect of the Vatican Secret Archives since 2007). Pagano has argued convincingly that the 1616 precept to Galileo by Inquisition commissary Seghizzi is authentic and not a forgery. This is an important accomplishment because it settles a controversy that has raged since the 1860’s, with wide-ranging cultural repercussions. However, the precept’s documentary authenticity does not prove its factual accuracy, nor its juridical legitimacy. Indeed, it can be shown that the precept was illegitimate, because it contradicts Pope Paul V’s orders and cardinal-inquisitor Robert Bellarmine’s testimony. Pagano apparently conflates, and equivocates among, these three concepts, as well as among the contents of four distinct orders to Galileo regarding Copernicanism: Pope Paul’s orders not to believe and not to discuss, Bellarmine’s warning not to hold or defend as true or as biblically compatible, and Seghizzi’s precept not to hold or teach in any way.
Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642; Inquisition; Logic; Reasoning
Philosophy | Philosophy of Science
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Finocchiaro, M. A.
Authenticity vs. Accuracy vs. Legitimacy: Pagano on the Vatican Documents.
Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo, 40
Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Cham.