Galileo’s Father: Method and Argument in Musicology, Physics, and Astronomy
Document Type
Book Section
Publication Date
8-29-2021
Publication Title
Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo
Publisher
Springer, Cham
Publisher Location
Cham, Switzerland
Volume
40
First page number:
163
Last page number:
186
Abstract
This is a critical analysis of the relationship between Galileo’s Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican (1632) and his father Vincenzo’s Dialogue on Ancient and Modern Music (1581). The analysis is carried out with the awareness that Vincenzo practiced systematically the experimental method in the science of music, and thus influenced Galileo, who applied it in the physics of falling bodies. Moreover, there are some conspicuous similarities between the two books, e.g. their titles and their nuanced critique of authority. However, there is no comparison between Galileo’s and Vincenzo’s books with regard to dramatic power, unified coherence, critical reasoning, and methodological self-reflection. Furthermore, whereas the son favors the moderns, the father favors the ancients; and whereas the son advocates an anti-clerical position, the father advocates a pro-clerical position. It follows that, unlike the case of experimentation, the son in writing his Dialogue did not learn, and could not have learned, much from his father’s Dialogue.
Controlled Subject
Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642; Musicology; Astronomy; Physics
Disciplines
Music | Philosophy | Philosophy of Science
Language
English
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Repository Citation
Finocchiaro, M. A.
(2021).
Galileo’s Father: Method and Argument in Musicology, Physics, and Astronomy.
Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo, 40
163-186.
Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Cham.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77147-8_9