Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-1-2015
Publication Title
Science, Religion and Culture
Publisher
Smith and Franklin Academic Publishing
Volume
2
Issue
4
First page number:
124
Last page number:
142
Abstract
In 1633, the Inquisition condemned Galileo for defending Copernicus’s hypothesis of the earth’s motion and denying the scientific authority of Scripture. This ended the original controversy, but generated a new one that continues today, for example, about whether the condemnation proves the incompatibility between science and religion. Recently the Galileo affair has been studied by several scholars whom I label “Berkeley para-clericals,” chiefly philosopher Paul Feyerabend and historian John Heilbron. Their approach is distinctive: it views controversial topics involving the relationship between science and religion from a perspective that is secular-minded, but appreciative of religion, and yet conducted in the belief that such topics are too important to leave to religious believers. This approach also characterizes the work of other Berkeley para-clericals, such as Ronald Numbers on the controversy over creationism and evolutionism; they stress such attitudes as impartiality, judiciousness, and even-handedness.
Disciplines
Philosophy
File Format
File Size
234 KB
Language
English
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Repository Citation
Finocchiaro, M. A.
(2015).
A Para-clerical Approach to the Galileo Affair and to Science vs. Religion.
Science, Religion and Culture, 2(4),
124-142.
Smith and Franklin Academic Publishing.
https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/philosophy_fac_articles/22