Award Date

1-1-2003

Degree Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

Department

Criminal Justice

First Committee Member

Terrance Meithe

Number of Pages

45

Abstract

Bite marks have become widely used in criminal-cases in the last 10 years due to the fact that greater public attention to dental hygiene and professional dentistry record keeping has increased the number of dental x-rays used for compariSon Dental evidence is accepted in courts, but its validity and the scientific basis for its use as evidence, has been questioned. One problem is the wide variety of dental techniques described in the literature and the lack of direction from both European and American forensic dental organizations; The paper explores the history of scientific evidence, addresses the evidence standards presented in court, and discusses its acceptance as scientific evidence. It also reviews bite mark evidence, describes the different techniques being used in collecting such evidence, and discusses the validity and reliability issues surrounding it. The paper ends with a critical review of the implications of scientific evidence for future use in general, the development of new standards for recovering such evidence, and its public acceptance.

Keywords

Basis; Bite; Evidence; Mark; Scientific; Teeth; Validity; Violent

Controlled Subject

Criminology

File Format

pdf

File Size

1157.12 KB

Degree Grantor

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Language

English

Permissions

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to digitalscholarship@unlv.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Identifier

https://doi.org/10.25669/uahf-4yu9


Share

COinS