Master of Arts (MA)
Anthropology and Ethnic Studies
First Committee Member
Jennifer L. Thompson
Number of Pages
Modern anthropologists reject the notion that individuals can be assigned to clear-cut divisions of racial origins, yet this identification technique is a required practice in forensic settings. Forensic anthropologists study morphological features and craniometric values to assess the possible ancestry of an unidentified set of human remains. This ancestral assessment is subsequently translated into a "racial" description, as these categories are commonly used and understood by society; Race, however, is an artificial social construction, and racial categories fluctuate over time and space. Consequently, the forensic assessment of race based on cranial characteristics could significantly differ from an individual's self-assessment of his or her racial identity; The following research study explores this paradox within anthropology. The use of contemporary archival records consisting of both three-dimensional skull images and patient data reveals the extent to which an individual's self-reported race corresponds to that predicted by osteological analysis. Results show that the use of craniometric data to determine an unknown individual's race may not be a reliable technique.
Assessment; Correlation; Craniometric; Identities; Patterning; Racial; Reflection; Reported; Self
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to email@example.com and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Lockwood, Rebecca V, "True reflections? An assessment of the correlation between self-reported racial identities and craniometric patterning" (2008). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2412.