Title

Outcomes in Patients with Gunshot Wounds to the Brain

Authors

Leigh Anna Robinson, Univerity of Kansas Medical Center
Lauren M. Turco, Spectrum Health Butterworth HospitalFollow
Bryce Robinson, Harborview Medical Center
Joshua G. Corsa, Harborview Medical Center
Michael Mount, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System
Amy V. Hamrick, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System
John Berne, Broward Health
Dalier R. Mederos, Broward Health
Allison G. McNickle, Uinversity of Nevada, Las Vegas
Paul J. Chestovich, University of Nevada, Las VegasFollow
Jason Weinberger, Christiana Care Health System
Areg Grigorian, University of California Irvine School of Medicine
Jeffry Nahmias, University of California Irvine School of Medicine
Jane K. Lee, University of Illinois at Chicago
Kevin L. Chow, University of Illinois at Chicago
Erik J. Olson, University of Pennsylvania Health System
Jose L. Pascual, University of Pennsylvania Health System
Rachele Solomon, Memorial Regional Hospital
Danielle A. Pigneri, Memorial Regional Hospital
Husayn A. Ladhani, Case Western Reserve University Hospital
Joanne Fraifogl, Case Western Reserve University Hospital
Terry Curry, UC San Diego Health
Todd W. Costantini, UC San Diego Health
Manasnun Kongwibulwut, Massachusetts General Hospital
Haytham Kaafarani, Massachusetts General Hospital
Janika San Roman, Cooper University Hospital
Craig Schreiber, Cooper University Hospital
Anna Goldenberg-Sandau, Cooper University Hospital
Parker Hu, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Patrick Bosarge, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Rindi Uhlich, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-17-2019

Publication Title

Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open

Volume

4

Issue

1

First page number:

1

Last page number:

5

Abstract

Introduction: Gunshot wounds to the brain (GSWB) confer high lethality and uncertain recovery. It is unclear which patients benefit from aggressive resuscitation, and furthermore whether patients with GSWB undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have potential for survival or organ donation. Therefore, we sought to determine the rates of survival and organ donation, as well as identify factors associated with both outcomes in patients with GSWB undergoing CPR. Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study at 25 US trauma centers including dates between June 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. Patients were included if they suffered isolated GSWB and required CPR at a referring hospital, in the field, or in the trauma resuscitation room. Patients were excluded for significant torso or extremity injuries, or if pregnant. Binomial regression models were used to determine predictors of survival/organ donation. Results: 825 patients met study criteria; the majority were male (87.6%) with a mean age of 36.5 years. Most (67%) underwent CPR in the field and 2.1% (n=17) survived to discharge. Of the non-survivors, 17.5% (n=141) were considered eligible donors, with a donation rate of 58.9% (n=83) in this group. Regression models found several predictors of survival. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. Conclusion: We found that GSWB requiring CPR during trauma resuscitation was associated with a 2.1% survival rate and overall organ donation rate of 10.3%. Several factors appear to be favorably associated with survival, although predictions are uncertain due to the low number of survivors in this patient population. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. These results are a starting point for determining appropriate treatment algorithms for this devastating clinical condition. Level of evidence: Level II.

Disciplines

Critical Care | Emergency Medicine | Neurology | Trauma

Language

English

UNLV article access

Search your library

COinS