Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science
First Committee Member
Dr. Helen Neill, Ph.D., Examination Committee Chair
Number of Pages
The federal government lists Kyle Canyon, Nevada, as an at-risk wildland-urban interface community. Stakeholders' attitudes and preferences about wildfires and mitigation options were assessed through a survey. 541 surveys were sent and 107 returned. More than a majority of stakeholders report the chances of wildfire occurrence as very likely. Stakeholders demonstrate consensus in reporting high concern about wildfire potential for Kyle Canyon, Nevada. Fire fighters assign the greatest responsibility for mitigating wildfire risks to Clark County, Nevada, and the federal government, while resident property owners do not assign responsibility consistently to any particular group. Trimming is the most favored mitigation method, and most stakeholders report an aversion to prescribed burning. The amounts of money that people are willing to pay monthly or annually for mitigation methods are variable and not significant for property owners, yet significant negatively for fire fighters with respect to the annual payment. Within the framework of the risk, communication and economics disciplines, this study offers strong evidence that resident and non-resident property owners and firefighters should be directly involved in making decisions regarding wildfire risk in Kyle Canyon, Nevada.
Kyle Canyon (Nev.); Nevada; Wildfires; Fire prevention; Wildfire risk
Environmental Health and Protection | Environmental Sciences | Natural Resources Management and Policy
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
O'Brien, James P., "Valuing wildfire risk mitigation in Kyle Canyon, Nevada" (2005). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 246.
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/