A Contingency Model of Computer and Internet Self-Efficacy
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2006
Publication Title
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
43
Issue
4
First page number:
541
Last page number:
550
Abstract
Information system researchers have recently devoted considerable attention to the concept of computer self-efficacy in order to understand computer user behavior and system use. This article reports on the development and examination of a contingency model of computer and Internet self-efficacy. User attitude and computer anxiety were assumed to influence the development of computer and Internet self-efficacy. Measures of user attitude, computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy were used in a university environment to collect 347 responses at both the beginning and end of an introductory computer course. Results suggested that training significantly improved computer and Internet self-efficacy. Respondents with 'favorable' attitudes toward computers improved their self-efficacy significantly more than respondents with 'unfavorable' attitudes. Respondents with 'low' computer anxiety improved their self-efficacy significantly more than respondents with 'high' computer anxiety. The interaction effect between attitude and anxiety was significant for computer self-efficacy scores but not for Internet self-efficacy scores. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords
Computer literacy; Computer users; Internet users; Self-efficacy
Disciplines
Business | Community-Based Research | Computer Sciences | Systems and Communications
Permissions
Use Find in Your Library, contact the author, or use interlibrary loan to garner a copy of the article. Publisher copyright policy allows author to archive post-print (author’s final manuscript). When post-print is available or publisher policy changes, the article will be deposited
Repository Citation
Torkzadeh, G.,
Chang, J. C.,
Demirhan, D.
(2006).
A Contingency Model of Computer and Internet Self-Efficacy.
Information & Management, 43(4),
541-550.