Award Date
8-1-2012
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Education (EdD)
Department
Educational Leadership
First Committee Member
Teresa Jordan
Second Committee Member
LeAnn Putney
Third Committee Member
Edith Rusch
Fourth Committee Member
James Hager
Fifth Committee Member
Martha Young
Number of Pages
175
Abstract
This study identified the control structures and power relationships that exist in four state language of instruction policies using a neo-institutional and postmodern framework. Policies selected include two states with English-only instruction and two states without. Critical discourse analysis was applied in three phases (individual case, within-group, between group) using a Layers of Analysis Framework. Three key findings emerged. First, policy discourse has the potential to positively or negatively impact students. Second, issues of control and power emerge when misalignments exist between the state and society. Third, discourse style alone does not dictate a state's relationship to society. Recommendations include expanding the Layers of Analysis Framework to policies inside and outside education to substantiate the findings uncovered by this investigation.
Keywords
Critical discourse analysis; Education and state; Language of instruction; Language policy; Layers of analysis framework; Neo-institutional theory; Policy analysis; Postmodern theory
Disciplines
Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education | Education Policy
File Format
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Repository Citation
Dockweiler, Katherine Ann, "Language of Instruction Policies: Discourse and Power" (2012). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1665.
http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4332646
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
COinS