Award Date
5-2010
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts in Communication Studies
Department
Communication
First Committee Member
Thomas Burkholder, Chair
Second Committee Member
David Henry
Third Committee Member
Joseph Valenzano
Graduate Faculty Representative
David Holland
Number of Pages
129
Abstract
Most religious discourse is predicated on the assumption that our choices in life have eternal implications. For those who subscribe to a belief in an afterlife, rhetoric which exploits eternity to form attitudes and induce actions can be especially persuasive. This study performs a detailed analysis of a particularly compelling case of the rhetoric of eternity during the twentieth century: C.S. Lewis‘s fictional demon Screwtape. In The Screwtape Letters and ―Screwtape Proposes a Toast,‖ Lewis offers readers an eternal, though diabolical, perspective of the ―modern‖ intellectual climate during the twentieth century. By puppeteering a demon in prose, Lewis satirically lampoons secular humanism and attempts to inculcate his version of Christianity in his readers. This analysis utilizes a theoretical framework based in ancient rhetorical figure prosopopoeia and the work of Kenneth Burke, specifically his notions of perspective by incongruity and ultimate terms. The Screwtape discourses constitute an artistically resourceful attempt to transform an audience‘s worldview from the temporal to the eternal.
Keywords
Perspective by incongruity; Prosopopoeia; Religious rhetoric; Rhetoric of eternity; Screwtape; Ultimate terms
Disciplines
Communication | Religion | Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion | Rhetoric | Rhetoric and Composition
File Format
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Repository Citation
Coyle, Daniel J., "Diabolical ventriloquism: A Case study in rhetorical transcendence with C. S. Lewis’s infamous imp Screwtape" (2010). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 223.
http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1442587
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Included in
Communication Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, Rhetoric Commons