What War Narratives Tell About the Psychology and Coalitional Dynamics of Ethnic Violence
Journal of Cognition and Culture
First page number:
Last page number:
Models of ethnic violence have primarily been descriptive in nature, advancing broad or particular social and political reasons as explanations, and neglecting the contributions of individuals as decision-makers. Game theoretic and rational choice models recognize the role of individual decision-making in ethnic violence. However, such models embrace a classical economic theory view of unbounded rationality as utility-maximization, with its exacting assumption of full informational access, rather than a model of bounded rationality, modeling individuals as satisficing agents endowed with evolved domain-specific competences. A newer theoretical framework hypothesizing the existence of a human coalitional psychology, an evolved domain of competence, allows us to make sense of core features of memorial narratives about ethnic violence. Qualitative data from the interviews of fifty-seven participants who were impacted by the Croatian Homeland War support expectations entailed by a coalitional psychology model of ethnic strife.
Ethnic violence; Coalitional psychology; Croatia; Bounded rationality; Memory
Ethnic Studies | Social and Cultural Anthropology
What War Narratives Tell About the Psychology and Coalitional Dynamics of Ethnic Violence.
Journal of Cognition and Culture, 19(2019-01-02),