Carbonaceous aerosols in megacity Xi'an, China: Implications of thermal/optical protocols comparison

Authors

Y M. Han, Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityFollow
Lung Wen Chen, University of Nevada, Las VegasFollow
R J. Huang, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
J C. Chow, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
J G. Watson, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
H Y. Ni, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
S X. Liu, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
K K. Fung, AtmAA Inc
Z X. Shen, Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityFollow
C Wei, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
Q Y. Wang, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow
J Tian, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Z Z. Zhao, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
A SH Prévôt, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
J J. Cao, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2016

Publication Title

Atmospheric Environment

Volume

132

First page number:

58

Last page number:

68

Abstract

Carbonaceous aerosol is an important component that influences the environment, climate, and human health. Organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) are the two main constituents of carbonaceous aerosols that have opposite, i.e., cooling versus warming, effects on the Earth's radiation balance. Knowledge on the variability of OC/EC splits measured by different thermal/optical protocols is useful for understanding the uncertainty in the climate models. This study shows good correlations within OC or EC (r2 > 0.83, P < 0.001) across the IMPROVE, IMPROVE_A, and EUSAAR_2 protocols for both ambient aerosol samples and biomass burning samples. However, EC concentrations differ by more than two folds, and OC/EC ratios differ up to a factor of 2.7. The discrepancies were attributed to the selection between the reflectance and transmittance corrections and the different peak inert-atmosphere temperature. The IMPROVE and IMPROVE_A protocols also quantified different char and soot concentrations, two subtypes of EC with distinct chemical and optical properties. Char, but not soot, was found to correlate with the humic-like substances (HULIS) content in the samples, suggesting that both char and HULIS originate mainly from biomass burning. A one-year (2012-2013) ambient aerosol monitoring in Xi'an, China, shows that OC, EC, and char displayed winter highs and summer lows, while soot had no seasonal trend. The char/soot ratios showed a "single peak" in winter, while OC/EC ratios exhibited "dual peak" feature due to the influence of secondary organic aerosol formation. In addition to commonly measured OC and EC, we recommend both char and soot from a common reference method to be considered in the chemical transport and climate models. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

Biomass burning emissions; Carbonaceous aerosols; Char and soot; Climatic implications; Organic and elemental carbon measurement; Temporal variations; Thermal/optical protocols

Language

English

Repository Citation

Han, Y. M., Chen, L., Huang, R. J., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Ni, H. Y., Liu, S. X., Fung, K. K., Shen, Z. X., Wei, C., Wang, Q. Y., Tian, J., Zhao, Z. Z., Prévôt, A. S., Cao, J. J. (2016). Carbonaceous aerosols in megacity Xi'an, China: Implications of thermal/optical protocols comparison. Atmospheric Environment, 132 58-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.023