Consumer Protection in the New Era of Sports Betting
Session Title
Session 2-1-C: Gambling Innovation in Policy
Presentation Type
Event
Location
Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada
Start Date
29-5-2019 9:00 AM
End Date
29-5-2019 10:25 AM
Disciplines
Consumer Protection Law | Law
Abstract
When the U.S. Supreme Court held, in the case Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act violated the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, it freed all states to pass statutes legalizing sports gambling within their borders. Multiple states have already either legalized sports betting or passed legislation that would do so, with many other states considering it. Opening the flood gates to legalizing sports betting should require the states (or even the federal government) to analyze what consumer protection should be included in any sports betting legislation, especially as states move to Internet sports gambling. This presentation will discuss consumer protection in sports gambling, designed to protect recreational gamblers, and compare it to harm minimization, designed to aid problem gamblers.
Consumer protection in sports gambling is a complex topic, as it involves the integrity of the underlying sports, wager integrity ensuring that winnings are paid out appropriately, and transparency of the gambling opportunities offered and of the complaint process and adjudication of disputes. Sports gamblers should not be tricked by deceptive marketing techniques. And consumer protection should be designed in coordination with harm minimization techniques to reduce the effects of problem gambling. Unfortunately, gaming commissions at times seem more focused on protecting gaming businesses than consumers. Currently, some sports leagues are proposing that they be paid “integrity fees” or a royalty for the use of their games as the subject matter for legalized sports gambling. Doing so could actually threaten the integrity of the leagues, as they become directly entwined with the profits of betting on their own games. This presentation will discuss these issues and proposals for reform.
Keywords
Gambling, Sports Betting, Consumer Protection
Funding Sources
No funding sources relevant to this presentation
Competing Interests
No financial or non-financial interests related to this presentation
Consumer Protection in the New Era of Sports Betting
Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada
When the U.S. Supreme Court held, in the case Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act violated the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, it freed all states to pass statutes legalizing sports gambling within their borders. Multiple states have already either legalized sports betting or passed legislation that would do so, with many other states considering it. Opening the flood gates to legalizing sports betting should require the states (or even the federal government) to analyze what consumer protection should be included in any sports betting legislation, especially as states move to Internet sports gambling. This presentation will discuss consumer protection in sports gambling, designed to protect recreational gamblers, and compare it to harm minimization, designed to aid problem gamblers.
Consumer protection in sports gambling is a complex topic, as it involves the integrity of the underlying sports, wager integrity ensuring that winnings are paid out appropriately, and transparency of the gambling opportunities offered and of the complaint process and adjudication of disputes. Sports gamblers should not be tricked by deceptive marketing techniques. And consumer protection should be designed in coordination with harm minimization techniques to reduce the effects of problem gambling. Unfortunately, gaming commissions at times seem more focused on protecting gaming businesses than consumers. Currently, some sports leagues are proposing that they be paid “integrity fees” or a royalty for the use of their games as the subject matter for legalized sports gambling. Doing so could actually threaten the integrity of the leagues, as they become directly entwined with the profits of betting on their own games. This presentation will discuss these issues and proposals for reform.
Comments
I attempted to submit this yesterday, so please excuse this if it is a redundant submission. Thanks!