Location

Greenspun Hall, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Description

Historically, unmanned aerial systems (UAS; i.e., drones) have largely been used by the military and federal government. As UAS have become more affordable and easier to operate in recent years, state and local law enforcement agencies have become interested in adopting this technology to facilitate a wide range of police activities (e.g., search and rescue, surveillance, tactical operations, etc.). The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has begun to regulate the use of unmanned aerial systems, which will likely lead to the increased use of drone technology by law enforcement agencies across the country in upcoming years. However, previous research suggests that public perception of UAS use by the police is mixed, and in some cases there is considerable resistance to police departments adopting this technology. In the present research, we explore several personality factors related to public attitudes towards police UAS use. More specifically, we conducted a national survey examining the relationship between public perceptions of police legitimacy and effectiveness, as well as fear of crime and victimization, and police use of drone technology. The potential implications for public policy and law enforcement practices, particularly in terms of the introduction of UAS into local communities, are discussed.

Disciplines

Criminology and Criminal Justice | Science and Technology Policy

Language

English


Share

COinS
 
Apr 18th, 1:00 AM Apr 18th, 3:00 AM

Power of Perspective: The Effects of Public Perceptions of Police and Fear of Crime on Attitudes Towards Aerial Drone Use

Greenspun Hall, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Historically, unmanned aerial systems (UAS; i.e., drones) have largely been used by the military and federal government. As UAS have become more affordable and easier to operate in recent years, state and local law enforcement agencies have become interested in adopting this technology to facilitate a wide range of police activities (e.g., search and rescue, surveillance, tactical operations, etc.). The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has begun to regulate the use of unmanned aerial systems, which will likely lead to the increased use of drone technology by law enforcement agencies across the country in upcoming years. However, previous research suggests that public perception of UAS use by the police is mixed, and in some cases there is considerable resistance to police departments adopting this technology. In the present research, we explore several personality factors related to public attitudes towards police UAS use. More specifically, we conducted a national survey examining the relationship between public perceptions of police legitimacy and effectiveness, as well as fear of crime and victimization, and police use of drone technology. The potential implications for public policy and law enforcement practices, particularly in terms of the introduction of UAS into local communities, are discussed.