The Effects of Impact Statements on Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions of the Victim and Defendant
Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice
First page number:
Last page number:
At the penalty phase of capital trials, emotionally charged testimony can be presented about the loss of the victim (Victim Impact Statement; VIS) or the potential loss of the defendant (Execution Impact Statement; EIS). This experiment examined how these impact statements influence mock jurors' decisions while accounting for evidence strength using a 2 (VIS or no VIS) X 2 (EIS or no EIS) X 2 (high aggravator case or high mitigator case) between-subjects design. Overall, results suggest impact statements do not strongly influence jurors' decisions. In contrast, evidence strength and perceptions of the defendant strongly predicted jurors' weighing of aggravators and mitigators and their sentencing decisions. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
Impact Statements; Death Penalty; Juror Decision-Making; Aggravating and Mitigating Evidence; Victim and Defendant Perceptions
Psychology | Social and Behavioral Sciences
West, M. P.,
Miller, M. K.,
The Effects of Impact Statements on Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions of the Victim and Defendant.
Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 15(2),