Physical Fitness Is Predictive for 5-Year Survival in Older Adults With Intellectual Disabilities
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-5-2019
Publication Title
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume
32
Issue
4
First page number:
958
Last page number:
966
Abstract
Background: The very low physical fitness levels of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) may influence their life expectancy. Therefore, we investigated the predictive value of physical fitness for survival in older adults with intellectual disabilities. Method: In the Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disabilities (HA‐ID) study,the physical fitness levels of 900 older adults (≥50 years; 61.5 ± 8.1 years) were measured at baseline. All‐cause mortality was collected over a 5‐year follow‐up period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between each physical fitness test and survival, adjusted for age, sex, level of ID, and Down syndrome. Results: The physical fitness components that were independently predictive for survival were manual dexterity (HR = 0.96 [0.94–0.98]), visual reaction time (HR = 1.57 [1.28–1.94]), balance (HR = 0.97 [0.95–0.99]), comfortable gait speed (HR = 0.65 [0.54–0.78]), fast gait speed (HR = 0.81 [0.72–0.91]), grip strength (HR = 0.97 [0.94–0.99]) and cardiorespiratory fitness (HR = 0.997 [0.995–0.999]), with a better physical fitness showing a lower mortality risk. Conclusion: We showed for the first time that physical fitness was independently associated with survival in older adults with intellectual disabilities. Improving and maintaining physical fitness must become an essential part of care and support for this population.
Keywords
Activity; Intellectual disabilities; Mortality; Older adults; Physical capacity
Disciplines
Disability Studies | Social and Behavioral Sciences
Language
English
Repository Citation
Oppewal, A.,
Hilgenkamp, T. I.
(2019).
Physical Fitness Is Predictive for 5-Year Survival in Older Adults With Intellectual Disabilities.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(4),
958-966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12589