Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
First Committee Member
Number of Pages
Mental health professionals have evidenced deficiencies in reporting child maltreatment, including knowledge about mandatory reporting laws, ability to accurately identify child maltreatment, child maltreatment reporting intentions, and clinical expertise in reporting child maltreatment (e.g., utilization of best practices in the management of clients throughout the reporting process). Therefore, the purposes of the given study were to develop and initially validate three inventories (i.e., Knowledge of Child Maltreatment Laws Screening Tool, Recognition of Child Maltreatment Screening Tool, and Clinical Expertise in Reporting Child Maltreatment Screening Tool) to assess reporting competence in mental health professionals and graduate students. Multistage validation supports the initial reliability and validity of the developed screening tools. Future directions regarding the utilization of these instruments are discussed.
Child; Child Abuse; Child Abuse Reporting; Child Maltreatment; Child Maltreatment Reporting; Clinical; Examination; Issues; Legal; Maltreatment; Mandated Reporters; Mental Health Professionals; Maltreatment Reporting; Mental Health Professionals; Relevant; Reporting
Clinical psychology; Social service
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to firstname.lastname@example.org and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Carpenter, Alisha Marie, "Examination of clinical and legal issues relevant to child maltreatment reporting" (2008). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2809.
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/