Master of Arts (MA)
Number of Pages
This thesis critiques public finance economics from an Austrian school perspective. The critique employs property rights and Austrian method and economic theory; Chapter I provides a brief discussion of Austrian method. This is an important chapter because most of the criticisms offered in this paper spring from the Austrian school's unique method; Chapter II explains the property theory that will be used throughout this paper. This chapter argues for an uncompromising property rights theory that views the state as a criminal aggressor; Chapter III examines the foundations of public finance and subjects them to Austrian analysis. In some instances these theories will be critiqued to the point that they are no longer of use to the analysis in Chapter IV. In others, an improved Austrian version will be provided; Chapter IV looks at specific theories within public finance and explains how they fall short of value-free Austrian economics.
Austrian; Critique; Economics; Economists; Finance; Public; State
Finance; Public administration
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to firstname.lastname@example.org and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Tejidor, Richard Antonio, "Economists and the state: An Austrian critique of public finance economics" (1994). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 428.