Comparing Treatment Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Academic Centers and Non-Academic Centers Within the Mountain Region

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-23-2019

Publication Title

American Journal of Surgery

Volume

218

Issue

6

First page number:

1052

Last page number:

1059

Abstract

Background: Our objective is to explore differences in survival and treatment approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between academic centers (ACs) and non-academic centers (NACs), which may contribute to disparities in the Mountain Region (MR). Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, HCC cases from 2004 to 2015 in the MR were divided into AC and NAC subgroups. Cox-proportional hazard regression and binary logistic regression were performed to analyze survival, compare treatment patterns, and examine the effect of facility type and surgical approach on margin status. Results: Treatment at ACs, compared to NACs, is associated with improved survival. At ACs, the odds of surgical or systemic treatment were higher. The odds of receiving radiation and positive margins was lower. Overall, the odds of positive margins was higher with laparoscopic compared to open or an unspecified surgical approach; this relationship persisted on subgroup analysis of NACs, but not ACs. Conclusions: Treatment of HCC at an AC in the MR increases the odds of surgery and improves survival. A laparoscopic approach increases the odds of positive margins, irrespective of center type.

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Survival; Margin status; Laparoscopic surgery; Outcome disparities; Treatment

Disciplines

Oncology | Public Health

Language

English

UNLV article access

Search your library

Share

COinS