Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-16-2019
Publication Title
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume
25
Issue
6
First page number:
341
Last page number:
354
Abstract
Background/Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in pregnant women. ERCP techniques without irradiation were recently introduced as potential alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety of ERCP in pregnancy and to compare outcomes of radiation versus nonradiation ERCP. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline/Ovid, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through April 18th, 2018 using PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines identified 27 studies reporting the outcomes of ERCP in pregnancy. Random effects pooled event rate and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured by I2, and meta-regression analysis was conducted. Adverse outcomes were divided into fetal, maternal pregnancy-related, and maternal nonpregnancy-related. Results: In all, 27 studies reporting on 1,307 pregnant patients who underwent ERCP were identified. Median age was 27.1 years. All results were statistically significant (P...) (See full abstract in article).
Keywords
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Gallstones; Pregnancy
Disciplines
Gastroenterology | Investigative Techniques
File Format
File Size
4485 KB
Language
English
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Repository Citation
Azab, M.,
Bharadwaj, S.,
Jayaraj, M.,
Hong, A. S.,
Solaimani, P.,
Mubder, M.,
Yeom, H.,
Yoo, J. W.,
Volk, M. L.
(2019).
Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, 25(6),
341-354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19