"Examination of the Reliability and Feasibility of Two Smartphone Appli" by Samantha E. John, Sarah A. Evans et al.
 

Examination of the Reliability and Feasibility of Two Smartphone Applications to Assess Executive Functioning in Racially Diverse Older Adults

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

8-12-2021

Publication Title

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

First page number:

1

Last page number:

19

Abstract

Inclusion of Black participants in clinical research is a national priority. Mobile applications and remote data collection may increase study access for diverse populations. This study examined the reliability and feasibility of two mobile smartphone application-based cognitive measures in a diverse middle aged and older adult sample. Black (n = 44; M age = 59.93) and non-Hispanic white (NHW; n = 50; M age = 61.06) participants completed traditional paper-based neuropsychological testing and two app-based measures, Arrows and Number Match. Intraclass correlations demonstrated poor to moderate reliability (range:.417–.569) between performance on the app-based versions and performance on the traditional versions. Performance score differences by racial group were not statistically significant. Both Black and NHW participants rated the app-based measures as feasible and acceptable, though Black participants endorsed a stronger likelihood of future use. These findings add to the growing literature on remote cognitive testing.

Keywords

Black; Feasibility; Non-Hispanic white; Reliability; Remote neuropsychological assessment; Smartphone application

Disciplines

Cognitive Neuroscience | Life Sciences | Neuroscience and Neurobiology

Language

English

UNLV article access

Search your library

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 5
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 5
  • Captures
    • Readers: 28
see details

Share

COinS