Master of Arts (MA)
First Committee Member
Second Committee Member
Third Committee Member
Fourth Committee Member
Number of Pages
Since the breakup of the colonial empires following World War II, many newly independent states have embarked on a path of seeking political and economic development. Scholars studying this phenomenon soon became aware of an interesting puzzle. Why do the economies that have substantial natural resource endowments at their disposal tend to develop at a slower rate than economies that are less endowed with natural resources? From this question, the resource curse theory was derived. The resource curse theory has three main claims. The first claim is that resource rich economies grow at a slower rate than non-resource rich economies. The second claim is that resource rich states are more prone to conflict. The last claim, that resource rich states are more prone to corruption, will be addressed by this study. Using data on resource rents and resource exports, this study utilizes statistical modeling to test the relationship between natural resource endowments and corruption. This study finds that only fuel related natural resources have a statistically significant and negative relationship with perceptions of corruption due to asset specificity and relative scarcity.
Corruption; Economic development; Political corruption; Political development; Postcolonialism; Resource curse; Resource rents
Economics | Growth and Development | International and Area Studies | Political Science
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Snyder, David Paul, "On the Merits of the Resource Curse Theory: Resource Rents and Corruption" (2013). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1952.
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/