Master of Arts (MA)
Journalism and Media Studies
First Committee Member
Second Committee Member
Third Committee Member
Fourth Committee Member
Number of Pages
The history of American journalism is replete with anecdotes about news reporters enduring jail and other penalties to protect the identities of confidential sources of information. Since as early as the American Revolution journalists have often found themselves at odds with established authority. In the political cauldron of the late 1960s and early 1970s, U.S. government intrusion into the news gathering process was widespread. The notion the First Amendment protected journalists from revealing sources was invalidated by the Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Branzburg v. Hayes. Many states throughout the nation reacted by codifying a reporter's privilege. Nevada did so in 1969, protecting members of the working media from having to divulge confidences to the government. The statute was revised in 1975 to cover former media members, but the law has remained unchanged since, despite much technological innovation and economic changes in the media industry. This study tells the untold story of Nevada's shield statute, the 1968 news story that sparked the quiet crusade for its passage, and the not-so quiet efforts in 1975 to make the already strong protections even stronger. It details as well a later unsuccessful attempt to modernize the law.
Confidential communications – Press; Freedom of the press; Government and the press; Nevada. Legislature; Reporter's privilege; Shield law
Broadcast and Video Studies | First Amendment | Journalism Studies | Law
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Ward, Matthew Travis, "The Untold History of Nevada's Shield Statute" (2014). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2310.
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/