Editors
D. Schwartz (Ed.)
Document Type
Occasional Paper
Publication Date
9-2014
Publication Title
Center for Gaming Research Occasional Paper Series: Paper 29
Publisher Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
First page number:
1
Last page number:
12
Abstract
Recognizing the growing threat of organized crime, then U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy sought to get the “bankrollers and kingpins” by introducing the Federal Wire Act in 1961, which sought to target the mob’s most profitable racket—bookkeeping on horseracing and sports gambling by prohibiting such gambling on the nation’s communication system at the time (telephone and telegraph). More than 30 years later members of Congress sought to use the Wire Act to stop the rise of casino-style gambling on the Internet. However, the scope of the Wire Act has been disputed among lawmakers, courts, and federal agencies. In 2011 the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice announced its belief that the Act applied only to sports gambling, dispelling ambiguity and opening the door for states to legalize intrastate non-sport online gambling, such as lottery ticket sales and Internet poker. This paper examines the historical context in which Congress enacted the 1961 Wire Act and the interpretation of the Act over five decades and its implications for present-day regulatory proposals.
Keywords
Internet gambling; Sports betting; federal legislation; United States. Department of Justice; Wire Act
Disciplines
Criminology and Criminal Justice | Gaming and Casino Operations Management | Public Policy | Science and Technology Policy
File Format
Language
English
Repository Citation
Minton, M.
(2014).
The Original Intent of the Wire Act and Its Implications for State-based Legalization of Internet Gambling. In D. Schwartz (Ed.),
Center for Gaming Research Occasional Paper Series: Paper 29
1-12.
Available at:
https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/occ_papers/25
Included in
Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Gaming and Casino Operations Management Commons, Public Policy Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons