On the Role of Knowers and Corresponding Epistemic Role Oughts

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-20-2021

Publication Title

Synthese

First page number:

1

Last page number:

26

Abstract

The claim that epistemic oughts stem from the “role” of believer is widely discussed in the epistemological discourse. This claim seems to stem from the common view that, in some sense, epistemic norms derive from what it is to be a believer. Against this view, I argue that there is no such thing as a “role” of believer. But there is a role of knower, and this is the role to which some epistemic norms—epistemic role oughts—are attached. Once we conceive of epistemic role oughts as attaching to the role of knower (and not the “role” of believer) we can better understand the nature of epistemic obligation and doxastic control. In advancing a new epistemic role ought approach that recognizes knowers as the subjects of epistemic role oughts, I explain why many epistemic oughts—epistemic role oughts—have normative force and presuppose voluntary control.

Keywords

Doxastic voluntarism; Epistemic deontology; Role oughts

Disciplines

Philosophy

Language

English

UNLV article access

Search your library

Share

COinS