Must Cognition Be Representational?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-21-2015
Publication Title
Synthese
Volume
194
Issue
11
First page number:
4197
Last page number:
4214
Abstract
In various contexts and for various reasons, writers often define cognitive processes and architectures as those involving representational states and structures. Similarly, cognitive theories are also often delineated as those that invoke representations. In this paper, I present several reasons for rejecting this way of demarcating the cognitive. Some of the reasons against defining cognition in representational terms are that doing so needlessly restricts our theorizing, it undermines the empirical status of the representational theory of mind, and it encourages wildly deflationary and explanatorily vacuous conceptions of representation. After criticizing this outlook, I sketch alternative ways we might try to capture what is distinctive about cognition and cognitive theorizing.
Keywords
Cognition, Demarcation criteria, Marr’s levels, Representationalism, Representation demarcation thesis, Folk psychology
Language
eng
Repository Citation
Ramsey, W. M.
(2015).
Must Cognition Be Representational?.
Synthese, 194(11),
4197-4214.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0644-6