Award Date
1-1-1999
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Kinesiology
First Committee Member
Mark Guadagnoli
Number of Pages
55
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of dynamic acquisition protocols by comparing dynamic and static KR schedules in a single experiment. Five groups of participants (n = 13 per group) completed 90 acquisition trials of a force production task. The analysis of delayed no-KR retention test revealed that the participants in the summary fading KR group performed better than the three static KR groups, indicating that the dynamic acquisition protocols produces more efficient learning than static acquisition protocols. This finding is interpreted as support for Adams' theory (1971) that the most appropriate acquisition protocol would be one that dynamically manipulates KR from higher frequency at beginning to lower frequency toward the end of the practice. However, the failure in finding the learning effect of reduced KR in this experiment is inconsistent with the conclusion of the previous studies (Guadagnoli et al., 1996, Winstein & Schmidt, 1990). The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed and the future directions are provided.
Keywords
Acquisitions; Dynamic; Fading; Knowledge; Protocols; Results; Summary; Test
Controlled Subject
Medical sciences--Study and teaching; Educational psychology
File Format
File Size
1361.92 KB
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Permissions
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to digitalscholarship@unlv.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Repository Citation
Sun, Changjiang (River), "Summary fading knowledge of results (Kr): Test for the dynamic acquisition protocols" (1999). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1049.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/8str-bjmy
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
