Award Date
1-1-2006
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Political Science
First Committee Member
David Fott
Number of Pages
99
Abstract
This work examines ethical theories of deontology, teleology, internal and external morality as applied in conventional and reflective moral methods towards equilibrium among eight normative values for healthcare including: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, privacy, confidentiality, veracity and fidelity. Upon critical analysis of conventional and reflective moral praxis's both are found to be insufficient in accommodating value pluralism. This work concludes by outlining a hybrid model for ethical decision making complementing both theories by bringing together conventions and reflection to more effectively guide professional medical practice toward the teleological aim of medicine.
Keywords
Clinical; Conscience; Conventional; Decisions; Doctor; Making; Morality; Reflective
Controlled Subject
Philosophy; Political science; Medical sciences
File Format
File Size
2641.92 KB
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Permissions
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to digitalscholarship@unlv.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Repository Citation
Delap, John Elliot, "A doctor's conscience: Conventional and reflective morality in clinical decision maKing" (2006). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2098.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/83zy-ekvi
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
COinS