Award Date
1-1-2008
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Political Science
First Committee Member
David Fott
Number of Pages
136
Abstract
This thesis seeks to improve our understanding of the relationship between state legislative professionalism and direct democracy. Using institutionalist theory as a framework, I employ negative binomial regression to measure frequency changes in statewide ballot initiatives (1990-2000) as a function of state legislative professionalism. I find that increased professionalism is associated with higher levels of ballot initiatives appearing on statewide ballots, after controlling for qualification difficulty, interest group strength, divided government, and demographic variables. While the conclusions may not provide insight as to the long-term (or short-term, for that matter) quality of the initiatives or referenda, they do provide insight as to when the citizenry is more likely to eschew one fundamental component of American government---representative democracy---in favor of what has quickly become another important component of American government---direct democracy.
Keywords
Democracy; Direct; Legislatures; Matter; Professionalism; State
Controlled Subject
Political science; Public administration
File Format
File Size
2478.08 KB
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Permissions
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to digitalscholarship@unlv.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Repository Citation
Mirjanian, Donald D, "Direct democracy and state legislatures: Does professionalism matter?" (2008). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2310.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/5q7s-ulah
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
COinS