Award Date
1-1-2001
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Education (EdD)
Department
Educational Leadership
First Committee Member
Gerald C. Kops
Number of Pages
133
Abstract
The purpose of this dissertation was to compare the mechanism utilized by the State of Nevada to fund its community colleges with the models used by other selected states to fund their two-year institutions. The comparison states that were chosen represented peer institutions of Nevada community colleges or systems held in high regard by the American Association of Community Colleges; These selected states, as well as Nevada, face difficult fiscal challenges funding their two-year colleges. Not only is there increasing competition for limited state resources, but virtually all of the states are projecting budget shortfalls due to the slowing economy; Nevada is among the majority of states that continues to use a funding formula to determine the amount of funds appropriated to community colleges. Currently, Nevada funds approximately 80% of the formula. This ranks below most of the comparison states involved in this study. Community college leaders in Nevada agree that the formula is not adequately funded; The guidelines used by the comparison states to fund their two-year colleges were analyzed with the goal of improving the funding mechanism for community colleges in Nevada. The results of the study indicated that two key areas in which Nevada fell below the other states were access to local tax revenues and tuition rates. Unlike most of the selected states, Nevada did not use local taxes as a funding source. In addition, Nevada's tuition was lower than the average cost for the other community college systems. Both of these revenue sources offer alternatives for improvement of Nevada's funding mechanism; Aside from the two areas identified above, Nevada community college officials interviewed asked for changes in the current funding formula. Included in the recommended revisions were to increase the full-time/part-time faculty funding ratio, provide enhancements to the instruction formula, and increase funding for technology and equipment needs; Community colleges in Nevada are expected to experience continued enrollment growth and play a prominent role in the economic development of their local communities. Without increased funding support, the chances for success will be limited.
Keywords
Colleges; Community; Community College; Comparative; Funding; Mechanisms; Nevada; Selected; State; States; Study
Controlled Subject
Education--Finance; Community colleges
File Format
File Size
3348.48 KB
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Permissions
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to digitalscholarship@unlv.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Repository Citation
Kelly, Christopher Pat, "A comparative study of funding mechanisms for community colleges in the state of Nevada and selected states" (2001). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2487.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/uhnp-dxhl
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
COinS