Award Date
1-1-1989
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Geoscience
First Committee Member
John W. Hess
Number of Pages
122
Abstract
Most ground-water sampling methods require the investigator to purge a large quantity of stagnant water from a well prior to collecting a sample. The use of in situ ground-water sampling devices which minimize or eliminate the need for purging would help to alleviate these problems. In this field comparison study, the performances of seven ground-water sampling devices, including two in situ sampling systems, were evaluated to determine if these devices would yield accurate, precise, and representative data. The sampling devices included a bladder pump, a bladder pump below an inflatable packer, a bailer, the Westbay{dollar}\sp\circler{dollar} Mp System, two in situ BAT{dollar}\sp\circler{dollar} devices, and a BAT{dollar}\sp\circler{dollar} well probe. The sampling devices were installed at a site contaminated by a benzene-chlorobenzene plume, and the comparison was based on the ability of the devices to recover "representative" concentrations of these volatile organic compounds. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.).
Keywords
Comparison; Field; Groundwater; Methods; Sampling
Controlled Subject
Geology; Geophysics
File Format
File Size
4147.2 KB
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Permissions
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have the full text removed from Digital Scholarship@UNLV, please submit a request to digitalscholarship@unlv.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.
Repository Citation
Blegen, Ronald Paul, "Field comparison of groundwater sampling methods" (1989). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/g67t-up7b
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
COinS