Award Date
8-1-2012
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Journalism and Media Studies
First Committee Member
Paul Traudt
Second Committee Member
Gary Larson
Third Committee Member
Lawrence Mullen
Fourth Committee Member
Tara Emmers-Sommer
Number of Pages
77
Abstract
The two main kinds of high definition television video formats broadcast in the United States are 1080i and 720p. Both formats are claimed to have advantages and disadvantages relative to the other format. However, there has been little academic research to determine viewer preferences of these formats, and whether the stated claims about each format's strengths and weaknesses are valid. This thesis addresses this lack of research by employing an experiment to determine viewer perceptions and preferences of these two high definition formats.
The two major findings from this study pertain to viewer preferences of 1080i/720p with regard to motion, and which format is preferred at night. Statistical analysis of this study's results contradict the often accepted notion 720p is the better format to record and display video involving motion. This experiment's results showed viewers have a significant preference for 1080i when viewing video involving high in-frame movement. It was also determined viewers prefer the 720p video format to a significant level when viewing video recorded at night. Other trends such as 720p being the overall preferred high definition television format were found, but not to a statistically significant level.
Keywords
1080i; 720p; Consumers' preferences; HDTV; High definition television; High definition video; High definition video recording; Progressive Scan; Video Formats
Disciplines
Communication | Communication Technology and New Media
File Format
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Repository Citation
Stubben, Michael Thomas, "Audience Image Preferences of 1080i and 720p High Definition Video Formats: An Experiment" (2012). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1697.
http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4332678
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/