Master of Arts (MA)
First Committee Member
Second Committee Member
Third Committee Member
Fourth Committee Member
Number of Pages
Research institutions have the responsibility to comply with laws that govern the oversight of all research including research with human subjects. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) review research protocols and approve research based on the rights and safety of research subjects. When conducting qualitative criminological research, researchers must weigh ethical considerations around their methods. These methodological considerations are coupled with guiding ethical principles that are fundamental to human subject research. One major consideration regards breaking confidentiality which can bring about great risk to participants. The following thesis focuses on the ethics of researcher-participant privilege and issues that qualitative researchers have in maintaining confidentiality due to institutional pressures, particularly those set up via Institutional Review Boards (IRB). Interviews were conducted with six (6) qualitative researchers in the field of criminology to better understand their experiences with disclosure, how they understand ethics around confidentiality, and what rationales they have for resisting requirements to disclose. Findings suggest that these researchers view IRB as upholding racist, sexist, and classist paradigms while doing nothing to actually protect participants from marginalized communities. The thesis concludes that researchers respond through acts of resistance that, due to the nature of their subversion, undermines the idea that IRB can protect participants at all.
Confidentiality; Ethics; IRB; Privilege; Qualitative Methods; Resistance
Criminology | Criminology and Criminal Justice | Epistemology | Ethics and Political Philosophy | Ethics in Religion
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Michael, Eric, "Researcher-Participant Privilege: Confidentiality and Qualitative Criminology" (2022). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 4441.
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Epistemology Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons