Award Date
May 2023
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Psychology
First Committee Member
Colleen Parks
Second Committee Member
David Copeland
Third Committee Member
Kris Gunawan
Fourth Committee Member
Jarret Keene
Number of Pages
84
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to examine how different forms of media, in particular science comics and illustrated texts, contribute to different patterns of learning. While the standard illustrated text seen in a textbook has been a useful tool for instruction, science comics appear to be an alternative that could be used in lieu of media that use the traditional illustrated text format. The comic format, known more for its visual appeal to readers, is consistent with the principles of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (Mayer, 2009), though comprehension may require different mechanisms (Cohn, 2013a). It was hypothesized that the joint processing of the narrative in the text and the visual narrative in the illustrations could make the comic format more effective for acquiring and remembering scientific information. Two experiments were conducted using explicit and inferential question types to compare performance between comics, illustrated texts, and text-only materials. Both verbatim and applied question types were included to see if performance changed based on the type of mental representation required to answer questions correctly. Image recognition checks revealed poor target-lure discrimination ability, which suggests that participants were not focusing on illustrated text images when presented. Null findings from these experiments may have implications for theory and future studies.
Keywords
comics; memory; multimedia learning; situation model; visual narrative
Disciplines
Cognitive Psychology
File Format
Degree Grantor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Language
English
Repository Citation
Pelzner, Jackson S., "Comparing Comics and Illustrated Texts in Multimedia Learning" (2023). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 4755.
http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/36114780
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/