Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2022
Publication Title
Journal of Public Policy
First page number:
1
Last page number:
29
Abstract
A patchwork of policies exists across the United States. While citizens' policy preferences in domains such as the criminal legal system, gun regulations/rights, immigration, and welfare are informed by their political predispositions, they are also shaped by the extent to which policy targets are viewed as deserving. This article centres the idea that collective evaluations matter in policymaking, and it ascertains whether subnational levels of deservingness evaluations of several target groups differ across space to illuminate the link between these judgements and state policy design. We leverage original survey data and multilevel regression and poststratification to create state-level estimates of deservingness evaluations. The analyses elucidate the heterogeneity in state-level deservingness evaluations of several politically relevant groups, and they pinpoint a link between these social reputations and policy design. The article also delivers a useful methodological tool and measures for scholars of state policy design to employ in future research.
Keywords
Deservingness; Immigration; Policing; Policy design; Social construction; Social welfare
Disciplines
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
File Format
File Size
1063 KB
Rights
IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Repository Citation
Kreitzer, R. J.,
Maltby, E. A.,
Smith, C.
(2022).
Fifty Shades of Deservingness: An Analysis of State-Level Variation and Effect of Social Constructions on Policy Outcomes.
Journal of Public Policy
1-29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X21000222